![]() We need to trust VPN providers to be telling the truth, there is no other way.īut, one thing I like about Mullvad is that it's not KYC, so they don't know any information about you per se from their interface at least. Although they have access to that information, they might not log it. They have to keep track of how many devices you have, so they are keeping that data. In this area, I think no VPN can be safe. I have to say that I don't think that Mullvad needs to safe the IP addresses to prevent unlimited devices at the same time! Thats for me not plausible! Therefore, the reports that log files are stored, which indicate the identity of the user, are simply lies. In practice, this information is sufficient to satisfactorily answer requests from authorities. In addition, the amount of data that is transmitted. In addition, Mullvad saves user log data, which includes the real IP address as well as the VPN IP addresses used and the start and end times. In our test, we were able to demonstrate the use of central databases that are also intended to prevent use on unlimited devices at the same time. But unfortunately that is not the reality. One of the main criticisms we had in our test was that Mullvad VPN recommends itself as “anonymizing” and pretending not to use log files. I have a question concerning the no-log policy. I am using Mullvad and I don't have problems with it, I even recommend it and I like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |